- This new feature is a fun one for me.
Gives me a chance to look
- at the cars a little more critically. I
hope you enjoy it.
-
- For this inaugural Let's Compare I chose
3 cars, a Hot Wheels
- Editors Choice 57 Chevy, a Johnny
Lightning Tri-Chevy Series Three 57 Chevy,
- and a Matchbox Premiere 57 Chevy.
- I chose these for the similarity in
price, and also for the fact
- they each have rubber wheels. I also
happen to really like all 3.
- The Matchbox Premiere was 5.99, the Hot
Wheels EC was 5.99,
- (or .99 if you got it on clearance), and
the Johnny Lightning
- was 3.99.
-
- Here's a picture of all 3
together, both front and rear:
- The cars are lined up MB, JL, HW.
Right off the bat, you can see that the
- Johnny Lightning version appears "skinny".
It almost looks like the car is considerably
- smaller than a 1/64th scale. We all know that none of
these cars are true 1/64th size,
- but this one really is thin looking. The length of the
car is the same as the other 2.
- Both the MB and the HW versions look more true to the
real width of the
- car in relation to length. Grille detailing, however,
is best accomplished on
- the JL car. The gold insert and Chevy logo look better
than the other 2.
- The MB car is also done very well, but the blacked out
grille kind of detracts
- a little. The HW version is good, but the lights and
other details in the grille
- are not painted. Just a
single chromed piece. Another odd thing on the HW
- is the "55 Chevy looking"
taillights.
- Johnny Lightning also has the best front and rear
bumpers, with MB coming
- in a close second.
-
- Here are side shots of all 3, HW, MB, and JL
-
- The JL version does the best job of keeping the wheel
wells standard looking.
- The MB version is also good, but the rear wheel well
is a bit to high and rounded.
- The HW version isn't even close, but that may be due
to the car being more
- of a Hot Rod than a stock car. The paint detailing and
tampos on the
- MB are the best. All the badging is correct, right
down to the
- crossed flags on the fender. The JL version is also
very good. Again,
- the Hot Rod nature of the HW version doesn't lend
itself to stock details.
- The paint work on all three is very good overall, with
the HW done up
- in a Hot Rod scheme. The overall stock look of the MB
and JL
- is captured well in both cars.
-
- Two of the cars, the MB and the JL have added features
which
- put them above the HW.
- The JL version features and opening hood and detailed
motor,
- while the MB version has a very striking interior.
-
-
- Ok, so there you have it. 3 versions of a popular
casting. When I was
- looking these cars over, and writing this article, a
little change in thought
- occurred to me. I was convinced going into this that
the MB car was
- far and away the best. But as I was writing this, and
looking very closely
- at the cars, I had a change of heart. Although it
appears a little skinny,
- the JL version has more features, more details, and an
overall
- "good look", especially for the lowest price
of the 3. It's also the
- heaviest of the bunch.
- One a simple scale of 1 to 5, and this is only my
opinion,
- I'd rate them like this:
-
| 57 Chevies |
Paint |
Details |
Body Contours |
Value |
Overall |
| Hot Wheels
Editors Choice |
5 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
3.25 |
| Matchbox Premiere |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4.25 |
| Johnny Lightning
Tri-Chevy Series |
4 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
4.50 |
-
- So there you have it. Again, my opinion only. Look for
more of these
- comparisons in the weeks to come.
-
- Joe